Fairness opinionsPharmaceutical Services2011

Pharmaceutical Product Development acquired by Hellman & Friedman and The Carlyle Group: fairness opinion by Morgan Stanley and Lazard

Announced October 3, 2011 · Going-private · All cash · DEFM14A filed October 28, 2011
Pharmaceutical Services CRO Sponsor: The Carlyle Group and Hellman & Friedman LLC
Enterprise value
$3.9B
EV / LTM EBITDA
11.4x
EBITDA $341M · 22% margin
EV / LTM revenue
2.56x
revenue $1.5B
DCF discount rate
8.5%–9.5%

Deal terms

ConsiderationAll cash
Price per share$33.25
Premium
Premium basis
StructureGoing-private
Termination fee$116M
Reverse termination fee$252M
Go-shop30 days · $58.1M reduced fee
Outside date

Implied value per share by method vs. $33.25 offer

Selected companies — EV / 2012E EBITDA (Lazard) $20.17 – $28.26
Selected companies — EV / 2012E EBITDA (management sensitivity case) (Lazard) $19.80 – $27.74
Selected companies — P / 2012E EPS (Lazard) $20.89 – $27.32
Selected companies — P / 2012E EPS (management sensitivity case) (Lazard) $20.38 – $26.66
Selected companies — 2012E PEG ratio (Lazard) $24.69 – $29.41
Selected companies — 2012E PEG ratio (management sensitivity case) (Lazard) $24.08 – $28.70
Precedent transactions — EV / LTM EBITDA (Lazard) $29.85 – $39.79
Discounted cash flow (Lazard) $31.20 – $48.73
Leveraged Buyout Return Analysis (Lazard) $29.44 – $39.40
Premia Paid Analysis (Lazard) $25.46 – $41.79
Analyst Price Targets (Lazard) $30.00 – $38.00
Historical Trading Prices (Lazard) $22.97 – $31.80

Ranges as disclosed in the banker’s summary of analyses; the red line marks the per-share consideration.

Opinion of Morgan Stanley to the target board

Delivered October 2, 2011

Filing slice does not include Morgan Stanley fee details; Morgan Stanley also conducted the go-shop process on behalf of the Company.

Opinion of Lazard to the target board

Delivered October 2, 2011 · Fee $1.3M, $1.3M on delivery of the opinion

Discounted cash flow assumptions

Discount rate8.0%–10.0%
BasisWACC derived from analysis of estimates of the WACC of the selected companies
Terminal valuePerpetuity growth
Perpetuity growth1.0%–2.0%
Exit multiple
Projection periodQ4 2011E-2016E
Projections usedmanagement presentation case and management sensitivity case
Implied value per share$31.20–$48.73

Management presentation case: $34.24-$48.73; management sensitivity case: $31.20-$44.18. Present value as of September 30, 2011; terminal values as of December 31, 2016. Lazard gave greater weight to the management sensitivity case.

Selected public companies (5)

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. · Covance Inc. · ICON plc · PAREXEL International Corporation · WuXi PharmaTech (Cayman) Inc.

MultiplePeer lowPeer medianPeer highRange appliedImplied per share
EV / 2011E EBITDA5.7x7.7x9.4x
EV / 2012E EBITDA5.0x6.5x7.4x 5.0x–7.5x $20.17–$28.26
EV / 2012E EBITDA (management sensitivity case)5.0x6.5x7.4x 5.0x–7.5x $19.80–$27.74
P / 2011E EPS11.0x14.1x18.4x
P / 2012E EPS9.1x13.9x14.2x 11.0x–14.5x $20.89–$27.32
P / 2012E EPS (management sensitivity case)9.1x13.9x14.2x 11.0x–14.5x $20.38–$26.66
2011E PEG ratio0.9x1.0x1.1x
2012E PEG ratio0.8x0.9x1.1x 0.8x–0.9x $24.69–$29.41
2012E PEG ratio (management sensitivity case)0.8x0.9x1.1x 0.8x–0.9x $24.08–$28.70

Selected precedent transactions (10)

DateTargetAcquirerMultiple
2011-05-04Kendle International Inc.INC Research, LLC
2010-12-28ReSearch Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P.
2010-05-06inVentiv Health, Inc.Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P.
2009-02-12PharmaNet Development Group, Inc.JLL Partners Inc.
2008-01-03AppTec Laboratory Services, Inc.WuXi PharmaTech (Cayman) Inc.
2007-12-21Quintiles Transactional Corp.Bain Capital/TPG Capital consortium
2007-07-25PRA InternationalGenstar Capital, LLC
2007-07-18WIL Research Holding Company, Inc.American Capital Strategies, Ltd.
2007-02-13BioReliance CorporationAvista Capital Partners
2006-05-09Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. – Phase II-IV Clinical Services UnitKendle International Inc.
MultipleLowMedianHighRange appliedImplied per share
EV / LTM EBITDA14.2x 10.0x–14.0x $29.85–$39.79

Other analyses

AnalysisSummaryImplied per share
Leveraged Buyout Return Analysis5-year investment period ending 12/31/2016, target IRRs of 17.5%-22.5%, total leverage of 6.6x LTM EBITDA, exit multiples 8.0x-10.0x LTM EBITDA. Management presentation case: $31.48-$39.40; management sensitivity case: $29.44-$36.43. Informational only, not material to opinion.$29.44–$39.40
Premia Paid AnalysisAll-cash healthcare transactions with total transaction value of $3-5 billion; mean/median premia of 36.6%/32.3% (1-day), 36.7%/29.1% (1-week), 44.1%/42.3% (1-month). Applied 25.0%-50.0% premium to the $27.86 unaffected price (July 15, 2011), implying $34.83-$41.79; applied same range to a market-adjusted implied unaffected price of $20.37, implying $25.46-$30.55. Informational only.$25.46–$41.79
Analyst Price Targets12-month target trading prices published by 12 Wall Street analysts ranged from $30.00 to $38.00. Informational only.$30.00–$38.00
Historical Trading Prices52-week period ending July 15, 2011; closing prices ranged from $22.97 to $31.80. Informational only.$22.97–$31.80

Fee of $1.3 million, all payable upon rendering of the opinion; expense reimbursement and indemnity. Lazard received approximately $21.9 million in fees from Carlyle entities in the prior two years; no fees from Hellman & Friedman entities.

3,000+ healthcare deal-level valuation multiples
The Valuation database includes financial details for more than 3,000 healthcare M&A transactions, private and public, with deal-level multiples, categorized by segment, type, and year.
See the Valuation database →

Management projections

Projection yearYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5CAGR
Revenue$1.7B$1.9B$2.1B$2.4B$2.6B11.2%
Revenue growth12.5%11.7%11.0%11.1%11.1%
EBITDA$407M$487M$559M$633M$726M15.6%
EBITDA growth19.4%19.7%14.8%13.2%14.7%
EBITDA margin24%25%26%27%28%
Implied EV / EBITDA9.6x8.0x7.0x6.2x5.4x

Year-1 growth is against LTM at announcement ($1.5B revenue, $341M EBITDA); later years are year over year.

Management prepared two five-year forecast sets in early July 2011: a management presentation case (provided to Carlyle, H&F and other bidders) and a management sensitivity case (prepared to test downside risk by cutting clinical development revenue growth by 2 points per year, lowering clinical development gross profit to 50%, and reducing selected laboratory revenue growth). Management presentation case: net revenue of $1,523 million in 2011 rising to $2,621 million in 2016, EBITDA of $341 million rising to $726 million, free cash flow of $94 million to $410 million, and EPS of $1.57 to $3.37. Management sensitivity case: net revenue of $1,523 million in 2011 to $2,490 million in 2016, EBITDA of $341 million to $655 million, free cash flow of $94 million to $369 million, and EPS of $1.57 to $3.13; management viewed the sensitivity case as the more achievable scenario and both Lazard and Morgan Stanley weighted it more heavily.

Process notes

Two fairness opinions were delivered to the PPD board on October 2, 2011 — by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (also the Company's sale-process and go-shop advisor) and by Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (retained August 18, 2011 solely to render an opinion, selected in part for its independence from Carlyle and H&F, though it had received ~$21.9 million in fees from Carlyle entities over the prior two years). The provided sections contain only Lazard's detailed analyses; Morgan Stanley's analyses were not included in the slice. Lazard's opinion excluded "sponsor holders" (shareholders affiliated with Carlyle or H&F), dissenting shareholders and rollover equity holders. The merger agreement contained a go-shop period running from October 2, 2011 until 11:59 p.m. ET on November 1, 2011, with a reduced termination fee of $58,101,463 for excluded parties versus the $116,202,925 standard fee; the reverse termination fee was $251,773,004, severally guaranteed by Carlyle and H&F affiliates. Through October 27, 2011, Morgan Stanley contacted 22 parties (9 strategic, 13 financial) in the go-shop; one signed an NDA and declined to bid.

Other Pharmaceutical Services fairness opinions

All Pharmaceutical Services opinions → · Morgan Stanley opinions · Lazard opinions